Showing posts with label tax. Show all posts

Captive Insurance and Other Tax Reduction Strategies – The Good, Bad, and Ugly

By Lance Wallach May 14th

Every accountant knows that increased cash flow and cost savings are critical for businesses. What is uncertain is the best path to recommend to garner these benefits.

Over the past decade business owners have been overwhelmed by a plethora of choices designed to reduce the cost of providing employee benefits while increasing their own retirement savings. The solutions ranged from traditional pension and profit sharing plans to more advanced strategies.

Some strategies, such as IRS section 419 and 412(i) plans, used life insurance as vehicles to bring about benefits. Unfortunately, the high life insurance commissions (often 90% of the contribution, or more) fostered an environment that led to aggressive and noncompliant plans.

The result has been thousands of audits and an IRS task force seeking out tax shelter promotion. For unknowing clients, the tax consequences are enormous. For their accountant advisors, the liability may be equally extreme.

Recently, there has been an explosion in the marketing of a financial product called Captive Insurance Plans. These so called “Captives” are typically small insurance companies designed to insure the risks of an individual business under IRS code section 831(b). When properly designed, a business can make tax-deductible premium payments to a related-party insurance company. Depending on circumstances, underwriting profits, if any, can be paid out to the owners as dividends, and profits from liquidation of the company may be taxed as capital gains.

While captives can be a great cost saving tool, they also are expensive to build and manage. Also, captives are allowed to garner tax benefits because they operate as real insurance companies. Advisors and business owners who misuse captives or market them as estate planning tools, asset protection vehicles, tax deferral or other benefits not related to the true business purpose of an insurance company face grave regulatory and tax consequences.

A recent concern is the integration of small captives with life insurance policies. Small captives under section 831(b) have no statutory authority to deduct life premiums. Also, if a small captive uses life insurance as an investment, the cash value of the life policy can be taxable at corporate rates, and then will be taxable again when distributed. The consequence of this double taxation is to devastate the efficacy of the life insurance, and it extends serious liability to any accountant who recommends the plan or even signs the tax return of the business that pays premiums to the captive.

The IRS is aware that several large insurance companies are promoting their life insurance policies as investments with small captives. The outcome looks eerily like that of the 419 plans and 412(i) plans mentioned above.

Remember, if something looks too good to be true, it usually is. There are safe and conservative ways to use captive insurance structures to lower costs and obtain benefits for businesses. And, some types of captive insurance products do have statutory protection for deducting life insurance premiums (although not 831(b) captives). Learning what works and is safe is the first step an accountant should take in helping his or her clients use these powerful, but highly technical insurance tools.

Lance Wallach speaks and writes extensively about VEBAs, retirement plans, and tax reduction strategies. He speaks at more than 70 conventions annually, writes for 50 publications, and was the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year. Contact him at 516.938.5007 or visit www.vebaplan.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

FBAR fines, IRS coming after YOU

Lance Wallach

If you had money overseas you need to act now. The IRS is coming to get you. Many overseas banks are reporting to the IRS on people that had money in accounts. OVDI and opting out are ways to deal with some problems.

Many tax clients with unreported offshore accounts ask if they will receive the maximum penalties if they decide not to enter into the IRS’s tax amnesty program. That’s a great question considering the IRS uses the threat of severe penalties to gain compliance with the offshore reporting rules.
The current amnesty program, called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (sometimes called “OVDI” or “OVDP”), allows those with unreported foreign bank and brokerage accounts to pay a 27.5% penalty based on the highest balance of the unreported accounts during the last 8 years. That means if you have an account worth $800,000 today and $1 million in 2009, the IRS would extract a $275,000 penalty.
There are reduced penalties for small accounts and in certain other limited circumstances.
Why would anyone agree to such a huge civil penalty? The answer is simple. Failure to disclose an offshore account can be a felony if intentional and carries civil penalties of up to 50% of the highest balance for each year the account was unreported or $100,000 per year, whichever is higher. That means if you have owned a $500,000 account for the last 4 years the penalty could be $1 million - an amount twice the value of the account! If you don’t believe us, just look at FAQ 12 on the IRS own OVDI website.
Most people who approach the voluntary disclosure program feel like they are between a rock and a hard place. Lose all your money and potentially go to prison versus paying a huge 27.5% penalty. Remember, the penalty is based on the value of the account. Most U.S. taxpayers with offshore accounts have already paid tax on the money they earned. Unless the money is from drug dealing or other illegal activities, the money has already been taxed once.
There is hope, however. The penalties most often quoted are for willful violations. Yes, there are some business people that intentionally try to hide money from the IRS or a spouse. Most violators, however, simply didn’t know about the law. The typical amnesty applicant is a dual national, an American living overseas, a foreign born American or a person sending money “home” to family in India, Mexico or China.
The IRS’ website does not draw a distinction between these groups. That causes many people who have truly made an honest mistake to needlessly panic.
Recently there has been a growing thought that the courts could strike down the FBAR* penalties law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Eight Amendment, adopted in 1791, says that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” While most people think of criminal and death penalty cases, there is a growing body of law surrounding the “excessive fines” language. [*An FBAR is a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account, the form that U.S. taxpayers must use to report foreign financial accounts yearly.]
In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to fine a person $357,144 for failing to report cash in excess of $10,000 being removed from the country. Removing cash is not illegal just like opening a foreign account isn’t illegal. The law requires you to report both transactions, however.
In striking down the fine, the court found it was “grossly disproportionate” to the violation.
There is little guidance thus far from the courts, however the IRS has recognized the dangers in enforcing the 50% - per - year penalties on innocent violations. The Internal Revenue Manual used by IRS employee’s notes that the penalties established by Congress is the maximum amounts that can be imposed. Revenue agents are instructed to consider warning letters or lower penalties except in the most egregious cases. You need to be very careful and get good help. You get what you pay for. I am getting lots of calls from people in trouble because their accountants do not know what they are doing on these issues
If you have an unreported foreign account, contact a CPA experienced in foreign reporting requirements. The best would be someone who was in the international division of the IRS. He can probably tell you right away your situation and make suggestions. The decision to file under the OVDI amnesty program or seek a traditional disclosure is one that requires careful investigation. Once you make a traditional disclosure it is impossible to seek amnesty, however an amnesty applicant can always “opt out.”

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Offshore Money, FBAR International Tax and the IRS

Hg Experts

Legal Experts Directory

By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness

FBAR, International Tax, IRS audits be careful. IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens Do YOU have money overseas? By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC - Recently the Internal Revenue Service reopened the offshore voluntary disclosure program to help people hiding offshore accounts get current with their taxes.

Additionally, the IRS revealed the collection of more than $4.4 billion so far from the two previous international programs.

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) was reopened following continued strong interest from taxpayers and tax practitioners after the closure of the 2011 and 2009 programs. The third offshore program comes as the IRS continues working on a wide range of international tax issues and follows ongoing efforts with the Justice Department to pursue criminal prosecution of international tax evasion. This program will remain open indefinitely until otherwise announced.

Lance Wallach and his associates have received thousands of phone calls from concerned clients with questions about the prior programs. Some of Lance’s associates are still very busy helping people with the last program. Not a single person has been audited and most are pleased with the results and are now able to sleep easily without worrying about the IRS. According to Lance, it requires years of experience to obtain a good result from the program.

He suggests using a CPA-certified, ex-IRS agent with lots of international tax experience. While this is not a requirement to file under the program, Lance has heard many horror stories from people who have tried to file by themselves or who have used inexperienced accountants.

“Our focus on offshore tax evasion continues to produce strong, substantial results for the nation’s taxpayers,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “We have billions of dollars in hand from our previous efforts, and we have more people wanting to come in and get right with the government. This new program makes good sense for taxpayers still hiding assets overseas and for the nation’s tax system.”

The new program is similar to the 2011 program in many ways, but it has a few key differences. Unlike last year, there is no set deadline for people to apply. However, the terms of the program could change at any time going forward. For example, the IRS may increase penalties in the program for all or some taxpayers or defined classes of taxpayers – or decide to end the program entirely at any point.

“As we've said all along, people need to come in and get right with us before we find you,” Shulman said. “We are following more leads and the risk for people who do not come in continues to increase.”

The third offshore effort accompanies another announcement that Shulman made today, that the IRS has collected $3.4 billion so far from people who participated in the 2009 offshore program. That figure reflects closures of about 95 percent of the cases from the 2009 program. On top of that, the IRS has collected an additional $1 billion from upfront payments required under the 2011 program. That number will grow as the IRS processes the 2011 cases.

In all, the IRS has seen 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. Since the 2011 program closed last September, hundreds of taxpayers have come forward to make voluntary disclosures. Those who come in after the closing of the 2011 program will be able to be treated under the provisions of the new OVDP program.

The overall penalty structure for the new program is the same for 2011, except for taxpayers in the highest penalty category.

The new program’s penalty framework requires individuals to pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or the value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure. That is up from 25 percent in the 2011 program. Some taxpayers will be eligible for 5 or 12.5 percent penalties; these remain the same in the new program as in 2011.

Participants must file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties.

Participants face a 27.5 percent penalty, but taxpayers in limited situations can qualify for a 5 percent penalty. Smaller offshore accounts will face a 12.5 percent penalty. People whose offshore accounts or assets did not surpass $75,000 in any calendar year covered by the new OVDP will qualify for this lower rate. As under the prior programs, taxpayers who feel that the penalty is disproportionate may opt instead to be examined.

The IRS recognizes that its success in offshore enforcement and in the disclosure programs has raised awareness related to tax filing obligations. This includes awareness by dual citizens and others who may be delinquent in filing, but owe no U.S. tax.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning. He writes about 412(i),, 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

IRS Tax Audits, 419 and 412i plans, Tax resolution services

IRS Tax Audits, 419 and 412i plans, Tax resolution services: Check out http://taxadvisorexperts.com! Expert CPA help with 419a, 419e, 419, 412i, welfare benefit plans, 6707a penalties, form 8886, IRS audits, Section 79, Captive insurance, FBAR, tax masters, jk harris, wpi, us tax shield.

Tax Audit Defense Professionals-419 and 412- i Plans

IRS Tax Audits, 419 and 412i plans, Tax resolution services

IRS fines | Stacey Arenas | Pulse | LinkedIn

Councilman Panco passes tax cap

www.brookhaven.org/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/Download.aspx?Command=Core_Download&EntryId=3382&language=en-US&PortalId=0&TabId=134

Don't Give the IRS Every Last Drop

By Lance Wallach

Have you seen the commercials where certain companies advertise that they can settle an IRS debt for “pennies on the dollar”? Usually the offer is too good to be true. Besides, you never want to have the problem in the first place.

The chances of an individual being audited have approximately doubled since 2000. So you need to be careful with your tax return.

IRS officials say research has shown that tax “noncompliance” typically is highest among people who work for themselves, who deal in large amounts of cash, who don’t have taxes withheld from their pay and whose income isn’t reported separately to the IRS, such as by their employer.

Another area that IRS has been focusing on for noncompliance is S corporations. With a typical S corporation, profits or losses flow through to the individual owners, who in turn are supposed to report those items on their individual returns.

Another are that could command attention is capital gains taxes. The reason: IRS officials suspect the government is losing billions of dollars in tax revenue because many investors inflate the cost basis, or the price they originally paid for stocks and other securities, in order to report lower capital gains when the securities are sold.

There have been some significant changes in the way the IRS targets businesses for audits and how it conducts them. Audits are up this year and will continue to increase,
But the numbers are very misleading, because the IRS is getting much smarter about how it chooses returns for audit and how its examiners conduct their audits.

Over the past few years, the IRS has dramatically stepped up efforts to study specific industries, and to educate examiners about business practices, terminology, accounting methods and common industry practices. It has also identified areas of inquiry that produce audit results.

Examiners are told specifically to look for certain red flags to get at what is really going on in a business or transaction. The result: examinations are more sharply focused on potential areas that will generate increased taxes, penalties and interest. Fortunately, there is a positive side to all of this; it’s very easy to obtain a free copy of this information from the IRS.

When you have a certain medical problem, you go to a specialist. The same rule should be applied to financial problems. Always engage an accountant who specializes in your type of business. One of our long-term retirement plan clients recently retained our firm to perform a self-audit. The client, a successful businessman, was concerned when one of his colleagues was found liable for back taxes and penalties because of some mistakes by his accounting firm. Nervous that he might become an IRS target as well. Our client hired us to do an audit of his income taxes for the last three years, both personally and for his various businesses. What we found was shocking. Even though this client had used an accounting firm for his various returns, the taxes he had paid were far from what he owed. Luckily for him, it was an overpayment. This client will get a refund of almost $200,000

Now let us turn to more positive alternatives, things that you can take the initiative on.

· Cash balance plan: A cash balance plan is a retirement plan that allows large contributions for owners. The deduction for owner sometimes can exceed salary. It can be combined with a 401(k) plan.

· SEP-IRA or basic profit-sharing plan? Think K instead. Many small business owners have used a SEP-IRA or basic profit sharing plan for their retirement needs due to the simplicity and low cost of these designs. However, recent changes to the Internal Revenue Code have made these designs virtually obsolete. The K is a retirement plan for the small business owner that allows him or her to achieve: greater potential contributions; “catch up” deferrals at age 50+; increased current tax savings; plan loans up to $50,000; expand survivor benefits; complete flexibility; and low costs. Unlike SEP-IRA, a K will allow you to borrow up to 50 percent of your account balance (not to exceed $50,000) as long as you pay yourself back. And whereas a typical 401(k) plan may cost $1,000 or more to establish and perhaps more to administer each year, a K can be established and administered for a fraction of that cost.
_________________________
Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters. He writes about 412(i), 419, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio's All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxaudit419.com and www.taxlibrary.us/TaxHelp.html
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Do You Have a Potential Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction

According to an internal IRS training document we recently obtained, the IRS is now targeting for audit small and medium sized businesses that created their own separate management companies. While creating a separate company to provide management services is legal, the IRS wants to make sure there is a legitimate business reason for doing so. The IRS is actively examining (auditing) businesses that are funneling large sums of money from the operating company to the management company and thus insuring the operating company pays little or no taxes. By transferring funds to the management company, the business strips away much of the income from operations.

Once the money is in the management company, the owners create a defined benefit plan that benefits only the owners and none of the rank and file workers.

http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=33068

Smart Retirement Plans

Newsletter Sign Up

Captive Insurance and Other Tax Reduction Strategies – The Good, Bad, and Ugly

FBAR fines, IRS coming after YOU

Lance Wallach

Offshore Money, FBAR International Tax and the IRS

Hg Experts

Legal Experts Directory

IRS Tax Audits, 419 and 412i plans, Tax resolution services

Tax Audit Defense Professionals-419 and 412- i Plans

IRS Tax Audits, 419 and 412i plans, Tax resolution services

IRS fines | Stacey Arenas | Pulse | LinkedIn

Councilman Panco passes tax cap

Don't Give the IRS Every Last Drop

Do You Have a Potential Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction

412i Sec. 79 plans, tax audits & IRS penalties.

lance Wallach - Quoted in Tax Article

Tax and Finance Articles - 419, 412i, tax shelters

412IPLANS.ORG: TAX AUDITS

The IRS has turned your accountant into their policeman