The Bank Secrecy Act Requires a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)

---

October 24, 2012     By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC

---

U.S. persons to avoid taxes by hiding money offshore. The FBAR covers a calendar year and must be filed no later than June 30th of the following year and includes any interest a U.S. person has. The Bank Secrecy Act requires that a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), be filed if the aggregate balances of such foreign accounts exceed $10,000 at any time during the year.

This form is used as part of the IRS's enforcement initiative against abusive offshore transactions and attempts by

· Offshore bank accounts;
· Offshore mutual funds;
· Offshore hedge funds;
· Offshore variable universal life insurance policies;
· Offshore variable annuities a/k/a Swiss Annuities;
· Debit card and prepaid credit card offshore accounts.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Lance Wallach
Lance Wallach, CLU, ChFC, CIMC, speaks and writes extensively about financial planning, retirement plans, and tax reduction strategies. He is an American Institute of CPA’s course developer and instructor and has authored numerous best selling books about abusive tax shelters, IRS crackdowns and attacks and other tax matters. He speaks at more than 20 national conventions annually and writes for more than 50 national publications.

Copyright Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
More information about Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC

FBAR fines, IRS coming after YOU

Lance Wallach

If you had money overseas you need to act now. The IRS is coming to get you. Many overseas banks are reporting to the IRS on people that had money in accounts. OVDI and opting out are ways to deal with some problems.

Many tax clients with unreported offshore accounts ask if they will receive the maximum penalties if they decide not to enter into the IRS’s tax amnesty program. That’s a great question considering the IRS uses the threat of severe penalties to gain compliance with the offshore reporting rules.
The current amnesty program, called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (sometimes called “OVDI” or “OVDP”), allows those with unreported foreign bank and brokerage accounts to pay a 27.5% penalty based on the highest balance of the unreported accounts during the last 8 years. That means if you have an account worth $800,000 today and $1 million in 2009, the IRS would extract a $275,000 penalty.
There are reduced penalties for small accounts and in certain other limited circumstances.
Why would anyone agree to such a huge civil penalty? The answer is simple. Failure to disclose an offshore account can be a felony if intentional and carries civil penalties of up to 50% of the highest balance for each year the account was unreported or $100,000 per year, whichever is higher. That means if you have owned a $500,000 account for the last 4 years the penalty could be $1 million - an amount twice the value of the account! If you don’t believe us, just look at FAQ 12 on the IRS own OVDI website.
Most people who approach the voluntary disclosure program feel like they are between a rock and a hard place. Lose all your money and potentially go to prison versus paying a huge 27.5% penalty. Remember, the penalty is based on the value of the account. Most U.S. taxpayers with offshore accounts have already paid tax on the money they earned. Unless the money is from drug dealing or other illegal activities, the money has already been taxed once.
There is hope, however.  The penalties most often quoted are for willful violations. Yes, there are some business people that intentionally try to hide money from the IRS or a spouse. Most violators, however, simply didn’t know about the law. The typical amnesty applicant is a dual national, an American living overseas, a foreign born American or a person sending money “home” to family in India, Mexico or China.
The IRS’ website does not draw a distinction between these groups. That causes many people who have truly made an honest mistake to needlessly panic.
Recently there has been a growing thought that the courts could strike down the FBAR* penalties law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Eight Amendment, adopted in 1791, says that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” While most people think of criminal and death penalty cases, there is a growing body of law surrounding the “excessive fines” language. [*An FBAR is a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Account, the form that U.S. taxpayers must use to report foreign financial accounts yearly.]
In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to fine a person $357,144 for failing to report cash in excess of $10,000 being removed from the country. Removing cash is not illegal just like opening a foreign account isn’t illegal. The law requires you to report both transactions, however.
In striking down the fine, the court found it was “grossly disproportionate” to the violation.
There is little guidance thus far from the courts, however the IRS has recognized the dangers in enforcing the 50% - per - year penalties on innocent violations. The Internal Revenue Manual used by IRS employee’s notes that the penalties established by Congress is the maximum amounts that can be imposed. Revenue agents are instructed to consider warning letters or lower penalties except in the most egregious cases. You need to be very careful and get good help. You get what you pay for. I am getting lots of calls from people in trouble because their accountants do not know what they are doing on these issues
If you have an unreported foreign account, contact a CPA experienced in foreign reporting requirements. The best would be someone who was in the international division of the IRS. He can probably tell you right away your situation and make suggestions. The decision to file under the OVDI amnesty program or seek a traditional disclosure is one that requires careful investigation. Once you make a traditional disclosure it is impossible to seek amnesty, however an amnesty applicant can always “opt out.”

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He speaks at more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Jail time for failure to file TD F 90-22.1 Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts

Lance Wallach

A former UBS, AG ("UBS") client from Miami Beach, Florida was sentenced to four months in federal prison for willfully failing to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts ("FBAR"), for the UBS account the man held with as much as $4,000,0000 in it. This information was released by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida on July 25 2012.

The former UBS client paid a civil penalty of $2,000,000 related to the $4,000,000 high account balance stemming from tax year 2006. Additionally, the former UBS client was sentenced to four months in federal prison, three years of supervised release, 250 hours of community service and a $20,000 criminal fine.

The UBS account related to two offshore corporations owned by the man, one in the Virgin Islands and one in the Republic of Panama. These corporations opened accounts at UBS. The man was not named as the direct owner but instead he was deemed only the "beneficial owner." The accounts with UBS were opened from tax years 2005 through 2007.

It is stated that the man was aware of the obligation on the FBAR to report as he had previously filed FBARs for other offshore corporations. An FBAR is required to be filed by both U.S. citizens and residents who have a financial interest in or signatory authority over a non-U.S. financial account with a value of more than $10,000 at any point during the tax year. The $10,000 amount is an aggregation of all non-U.S. financial accounts and not just an analysis on an account-by-account basis.

The information on the former UBS client was turned over after UBS agreed in February 2009 to pay $780,000,000 under a deferred prosecution agreement to settle the claim that UBS conspired to defraud the U.S. by impeding the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). UBS also agreed to turn over information to the U.S. Department of Justice on 300 account holders. Google Lance Wallach for more articles on point.

A US citizen or resident that held an account with UBS or any other institution that has not filed the necessary FBARs for the last eight tax years, should immediately reach out to get help to discuss any potential issues they may have and their alternatives. Filing for amnesty and then opting out are two options that our former IRS agents have successfully done for our clients. If not done properly it can be a disaster. We suggest you use a CPA with years of prior experience with the IRS international division.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on FBAR, OVDI, IRS tax amnesty and opting-out abusive tax shelters, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, OVDI,  IRS tax amnesty and opting-out and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or lanwalla@aol.com visit www.taxadvisorexperts.com  or www.Lawyer4Audits.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Offshore Banking

Foreign Bank Accounts

Offshore Banking is currently under great scrutiny by the US Justice department and the IRS. Offshore bank accounts and offshore income require special reporting to the US government. Owning an offshore account is not illegal, but US income taxpayers are required to declare and report any offshore bank accounts and income each year with their tax returns. The FBAR or Foreign Bank Account Report is used to report a financial interest in or authority over offshore accounts in a foreign country. The willful failure to disclose offshore accounts, or to report all of the information required on an FBAR, can result in severe civil and criminal penalties.

To Read More:http://taxadvisorexpert.com/Resources.html

IRS: Disclose Offshore Accounts or Go to Jail

Brian

That's pretty much the headline from a CNBC article on Friday. And it's true.

In 2009, 15,000 Americans came forward and admitted having foreign bank accounts. Unfortunately, Uncle Sam estimates there are some 500,000 more people hiding money offshore. Opening a bank account in another country isn't illegal. There are a whole host of reasons why people may wish to send money offshore. It only becomes illegal when you send money to a foreign country in the hopes of cheating Uncle Sam.

U.S. law makes it a felony if you fail to declare the income from foreign investments on your U.S. tax return and makes it illegal to not disclose the existence of the foreign account.

So what is a person to do? Taxpayers can do nothing and hope they don't lose the "audit lottery" (there are no winners with the IRS). Or taxpayers can come into compliance, report the account and pay the government ¼ of the highest dollar amount that was in the account. That's right, if you had an account with $200,000 in it, get out the checkbook and write a check to the IRS for $50,000.

Taxpayers wanting to take advantage of the current amnesty program (called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative) must move quickly, however. Unlike the 2009 program, which simply said you had to apply be the deadline, the current amnesty requires that all missing forms ("FBAR's"), amended returns and payment must be made by the deadline. There is a great deal of paperwork involved with the new program, waiting until the last minute is a recipe for disaster.

Those that don't comply face prison and loss of 50% of their highest account value.

So what is the risk of getting caught? We think it is quite high.

Transparency within the international banking community is at an all time high. And the developed countries are exchanging information. That means if Germany obtains information about accounts in a Bermuda bank it will likely share that information with other countries.

The U.S. has been issuing "John Doe" subpoenas to foreign banks fishing for the names of American account holders. Countries like Germany have been bribing foreign bank officials to simply steal the information and turn it over.

Still not convinced? The IRS paid its first award under the new whistleblower program - $4.5 million to an accountant who reported his employer! If anyone, anywhere knows you have a foreign account; they may report you and keep a large percentage of what you pay.

The world suddenly got much smaller.

This is interesting article but I do not believe everything in it is correct. I have received numerous phone calls from participants in these plans and the IRS is auditing.  For the most accurate information contact: Lance Wallach at lancewallach.com or call 516-935-7346

Offshore International Today

  IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens

---

By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC

Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness

---

Today, the Internal Revenue Service reopened the offshore voluntary disclosure program to help people hiding offshore accounts get current with their taxes.  Additionally, the IRS revealed the collection of more than $4.4 billion so far from the two previous international programs.

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) was reopened following continued strong interest from taxpayers and tax practitioners after the closure of the 2011 and 2009 programs. The third offshore program comes as the IRS continues working on a wide range of international tax issues and follows ongoing efforts with the Justice Department to pursue criminal prosecution of international tax evasion.  This program will remain open indefinitely until otherwise announced.

Lance Wallach and his associates have received thousands of phone calls from concerned clients with questions about the prior programs. Some of Lance’s associates are still very busy helping people with the last program. Not a single person has been audited and most are pleased with the results and are now able to sleep easily without worrying about the IRS.  According to Lance, it requires years of experience to obtain a good result from the program.

He suggests using a CPA-certified, ex-IRS agent with lots of international tax experience. While this is not a requirement to file under the program, Lance has heard many horror stories from people who have tried to file by themselves or who have used inexperienced accountants.

“Our focus on offshore tax evasion continues to produce strong, substantial results for the nation’s taxpayers,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “We have billions of dollars in hand from our previous efforts, and we have more people wanting to come in and get right with the government. This new program makes good sense for taxpayers still hiding assets overseas and for the nation’s tax system.”

The new program is similar to the 2011 program in many ways, but it has a few key differences. Unlike last year, there is no set deadline for people to apply.  However, the terms of the program could change at any time going forward.  For example, the IRS may increase penalties in the program for all or some taxpayers or defined classes of taxpayers – or decide to end the program entirely at any point.

“As we've said all along, people need to come in and get right with us before we find you,” Shulman said. “We are following more leads and the risk for people who do not come in continues to increase.”

The third offshore effort accompanies another announcement that Shulman made today, that the IRS has collected $3.4 billion so far from people who participated in the 2009 offshore program.  That figure reflects closures of about 95 percent of the cases from the 2009 program. On top of that, the IRS has collected an additional $1 billion from up front payments required under the 2011 program.  That number will grow as the IRS processes the 2011 cases.

In all, the IRS has seen 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. Since the 2011 program closed last September, hundreds of taxpayers have come forward to make voluntary disclosures.  Those who come in after the closing of the 2011 program will be able to be treated under the provisions of the new OVDP program.

The overall penalty structure for the new program is the same for 2011, except for taxpayers in the highest penalty category.

The new program’s penalty framework requires individuals to pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or the value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure. That is up from 25 percent in the 2011 program. Some taxpayers will be eligible for 5 or 12.5 percent penalties; these remain the same in the new program as in 2011.

Participants must file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties.

Participants face a 27.5 percent penalty, but taxpayers in limited situations can qualify for a 5 percent penalty. Smaller offshore accounts will face a 12.5 percent penalty. People whose offshore accounts or assets did not surpass $75,000 in any calendar year covered by the new OVDP will qualify for this lower rate. As under the prior programs, taxpayers who feel that the penalty is disproportionate may opt instead to be examined.

The IRS recognizes that its success in offshore enforcement and in the disclosure programs has raised awareness related to tax filing obligations.  This includes awareness by dual citizens and others who may be delinquent in filing, but owe no U.S. tax. 

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Treasury, IRS Issue Proposed Regulations for FATCA Implementation

Accounting Today

Lance Wallach

IR-2012-15, Feb. 8, 2012
WASHINGTON — The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service today issued proposed regulations for the next major phase of implementing the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
Enacted by Congress in 2010, the law targets non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers using foreign accounts.
The regulations lay out a step-by-step process for U.S. account identification, information reporting, and withholding requirements for foreign financial institutions (FFIs), other foreign entities, and U.S. withholding agents.
“FATCA strengthens U.S. efforts to combat offshore noncompliance. In doing so, we understand it creates a significant undertaking for financial institutions." said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. "Today's proposed regulations reflect our commitment to take into account the implementation challenges of affected financial institutions while allowing for a smooth and timely roll-out of the law."
The proposed regulations implement FATCA’s obligations in stages to minimize burdens and costs consistent with achieving the statute’s compliance objectives. The rules and implementation schedule are also adjusted to allow time for resolving local law limitations to which some FFIs may be subject.
FATCA was enacted in 2010 by Congress as part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act. FATCA requires FFIs to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U.S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest.
In order to avoid being withheld upon under FATCA, a participating FFI will have to enter into an agreement with the IRS to:

• Identify U.S. accounts,
• Report certain information to the IRS regarding U.S. accounts,
• Verify its compliance with its obligations pursuant to the agreement, and
• Ensure that a 30-percent tax on certain payments of U.S. source income is withheld when paid to non-participating FFIs and account holders who are unwilling to provide the required information.

Registration will take place through an online system which will become available by Jan. 1, 2013. FFIs that do not register and enter into an agreement with the IRS will be

subject to withholding on certain types of payments relating to U.S. investments.

Treasury and IRS will continue to work closely with businesses and foreign governments to implement FATCA effectively. Updates and further information on FATCA can be found by visiting the FATCA page on this website.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Jail time for failure to file TD F 90-22.1 Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts

Jail time for failure to file TD F 90-22.1 Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts

A former UBS, AG ("UBS") client from Miami Beach, Florida was sentenced to four months in federal prison for willfully failing to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts ("FBAR"), for the UBS account the man held with as much as $4,000,0000 in it. This information was released by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida on July 25 2012.

The former UBS client paid a civil penalty of $2,000,000 related to the $4,000,000 high account balance stemming from tax year 2006. Additionally, the former UBS client was sentenced to four months in federal prison, three years of supervised release, 250 hours of community service and a $20,000 criminal fine.

The UBS account related to two offshore corporations owned by the man, one in the Virgin Islands and one in the Republic of Panama. These corporations opened accounts at UBS. The man was not named as the direct owner but instead he was deemed only the "beneficial owner." The accounts with UBS were opened from tax years 2005 through 2007.

It is stated that the man was aware of the obligation on the FBAR to report as he had previously filed FBARs for other offshore corporations. An FBAR is required to be filed by both U.S. citizens and residents who have a financial interest in or signatory authority over a non-U.S. financial account with a value of more than $10,000 at any point during the tax year. The $10,000 amount is an aggregation of all non-U.S. financial accounts and not just an analysis on an account-by-account basis.

The information on the former UBS client was turned over after UBS agreed in February 2009 to pay $780,000,000 under a deferred prosecution agreement to settle the claim that UBS conspired to defraud the U.S. by impeding the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). UBS also agreed to turn over information to the U.S. Department of Justice on 300 account holders. Google Lance Wallach for more articles on point.

A US citizen or resident that held an account with UBS or any other institution that has not filed the necessary FBARs for the last eight tax years, should immediately reach out to get help to discuss any potential issues they may have and their alternatives. Filing for amnesty and then opting out are two options that our former IRS agents have successfully done for our clients. If not done properly it can be a disaster. We suggest you use a CPA with years of prior experience with the IRS international division.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on FBAR, OVDI, IRS tax amnesty and opting-out abusive tax shelters, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, OVDI,  IRS tax amnesty and opting-out and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or lanwalla@aol.com visit www.taxadvisorexperts.com  or www.Lawyer4Audits.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

Offshore Money, FBAR International Tax and the IRS

      Hg Experts 

           Legal Experts Directory

---

     By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction Expert Witness

---

FBAR, International Tax, IRS audits be careful. IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Reopens Do YOU have money overseas? By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC - Recently the Internal Revenue Service reopened the offshore voluntary disclosure program to help people hiding offshore accounts get current with their taxes.

Additionally, the IRS revealed the collection of more than $4.4 billion so far from the two previous international programs.

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) was reopened following continued strong interest from taxpayers and tax practitioners after the closure of the 2011 and 2009 programs. The third offshore program comes as the IRS continues working on a wide range of international tax issues and follows ongoing efforts with the Justice Department to pursue criminal prosecution of international tax evasion. This program will remain open indefinitely until otherwise announced.

Lance Wallach and his associates have received thousands of phone calls from concerned clients with questions about the prior programs. Some of Lance’s associates are still very busy helping people with the last program. Not a single person has been audited and most are pleased with the results and are now able to sleep easily without worrying about the IRS. According to Lance, it requires years of experience to obtain a good result from the program.

He suggests using a CPA-certified, ex-IRS agent with lots of international tax experience. While this is not a requirement to file under the program, Lance has heard many horror stories from people who have tried to file by themselves or who have used inexperienced accountants.

“Our focus on offshore tax evasion continues to produce strong, substantial results for the nation’s taxpayers,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “We have billions of dollars in hand from our previous efforts, and we have more people wanting to come in and get right with the government. This new program makes good sense for taxpayers still hiding assets overseas and for the nation’s tax system.”

The new program is similar to the 2011 program in many ways, but it has a few key differences. Unlike last year, there is no set deadline for people to apply. However, the terms of the program could change at any time going forward. For example, the IRS may increase penalties in the program for all or some taxpayers or defined classes of taxpayers – or decide to end the program entirely at any point.

“As we've said all along, people need to come in and get right with us before we find you,” Shulman said. “We are following more leads and the risk for people who do not come in continues to increase.”

The third offshore effort accompanies another announcement that Shulman made today, that the IRS has collected $3.4 billion so far from people who participated in the 2009 offshore program. That figure reflects closures of about 95 percent of the cases from the 2009 program. On top of that, the IRS has collected an additional $1 billion from upfront payments required under the 2011 program. That number will grow as the IRS processes the 2011 cases.

In all, the IRS has seen 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. Since the 2011 program closed last September, hundreds of taxpayers have come forward to make voluntary disclosures. Those who come in after the closing of the 2011 program will be able to be treated under the provisions of the new OVDP program.

The overall penalty structure for the new program is the same for 2011, except for taxpayers in the highest penalty category.

The new program’s penalty framework requires individuals to pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or the value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure. That is up from 25 percent in the 2011 program. Some taxpayers will be eligible for 5 or 12.5 percent penalties; these remain the same in the new program as in 2011.

Participants must file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties.

Participants face a 27.5 percent penalty, but taxpayers in limited situations can qualify for a 5 percent penalty. Smaller offshore accounts will face a 12.5 percent penalty. People whose offshore accounts or assets did not surpass $75,000 in any calendar year covered by the new OVDP will qualify for this lower rate. As under the prior programs, taxpayers who feel that the penalty is disproportionate may opt instead to be examined.

The IRS recognizes that its success in offshore enforcement and in the disclosure programs has raised awareness related to tax filing obligations. This includes awareness by dual citizens and others who may be delinquent in filing, but owe no U.S. tax.

 Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning.  He writes about 412(i),, 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

OVDI, FBAR, INTERNATIONAL TAX UPDATE: Deadlines, E-Filing Option and New IRS Form 8938

Lance Wallach
 June 15, 2012 

 American taxpayers. person with a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, any financial account outside the U.S. must file an annual report on Treasury Form TD F 90-22.1 Report of Financial Accounts, commonly known as an “FBAR” if the aggregate value of all such accounts exceeds 10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Unlike tax returns, which may be mailed on the filing deadline and be considered timely, the FBAR for 2011 must have been received by Treasury by June 30, 2012. As summarized below, over the past year, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network “FinCEN” has issued guidance regarding extended filing FBAR deadlines and new filing options. The Internal Revenue Service has also issued a new form Form 8938 that requires additional disclosure regarding foreign financial assets. There is now an online filing option that require only one signature. The online form and instructions provide for a more immediate means by which to ensure that the FBAR was received by the June 30 deadline. Since only one signature can be submitted on the electronic form, the e-filing process is not an option for joint filers. For filers not using the e-filing option, this form must be filed with the U.S. Department of Treasury, P.O. Box 32621, Detroit, MI, 48232-0621. The address for commercial delivery is: IRS Enterprise Computing Center, Attn: CTR Operations Mailroom, 4th Floor, 985 Michigan Avenue, Detroit, MI, 48226, contact phone number: 313-234-1062. Note that the contact phone number for courier delivery may not be used to confirm receipt of the FBAR. As clarified in the final regulations which were issued last year, the following definitions determine those individuals and entities subject to the FBAR filing obligation: 1. “United States person” is defined to mean a United States citizen or resident; an entity, including but not limited to a corporation, partnership, or limited liability company, created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States; and a trust or estate formed under the laws of the United States. Non-U.S. persons doing business in the United States are not required to file FBARs. 2. A “financial account” includes a savings deposit, demand deposit, checking, securities, security derivatives, debt card, prepaid credit card and any other financial instrument account, including certain insurance products and foreign pension funds. This includes an account with “a mutual fund or similar pooled fund which issues shares available to the general public that have a regular net asset value determination and regular redemptions." An equity interest in a hedge fund or private equity fund is not currently considered to be a “financial account,” though the IRS is considering this question further. A United States person having a financial interest in 25 or more foreign financial accounts, or signature or other authority over 25 or more foreign financial accounts need only provide the number of financial accounts and certain other basic information on the FBAR form. If requested in the future, detailed information concerning each account must be provided. 3. A person has a “financial interest” in an account if he has legal title or is the owner of record, regardless of whether the account is maintained for his benefit. For example, IRS guidance provides that an individual who may access a foreign financial account held on another’s behalf due to a power of attorney and who is the owner of record on the account has a “financial interest” in such account and must file the FBAR. In some cases, certain direct and indirect stockholders of corporations, partners of partnerships and persons holding voting or equity interests in other entities may be required to file FBARs with respect to foreign financial accounts of these entities. In particular, these rules apply to a United States person who owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent of (a) the voting power or the total value of the shares of a corporation, (b) the interest in profits or capital of a partnership, or (c) the voting power, total value of the equity interest or assets, or interest in profits. For example, if a U.S. corporation owns 100% of a foreign company that has foreign financial accounts, the domestic corporation must file an FBAR, as must any shareholder who owns more than 50% of the voting power or total value of the shares of the U.S. Corporation. A present beneficial interest in more than 50% of the current income or more than 50% of the assets of a trust that holds a foreign financial account triggers an FBAR filing requirement by the trust beneficiary. However, a trust beneficiary does not need to file the FBAR if the trust, trustee or an agent is a United States person and files an FBAR disclosing the trust’s foreign accounts. A person with a remainder interest in a trust is not within the scope of the FBAR. It is also possible that a discretionary beneficiary of a trust may not have an FBAR filing requirement with respect to the trust. 4. “Signature authority” is defined as the power of an individual to control the disposition of assets held in a foreign financial account by direct communication (whether in writing or otherwise) with the financial institution that maintains the financial account. An individual who merely has the power to allocate assets within an account does not have “signature authority” for the purposes of the FBAR filing requirement. Note that a United States person that causes an entity to be created for the purpose of evading the FBAR requirement shall have a reportable financial interest. In addition to any applicable FBAR filing obligations, certain individual U.S. taxpayers holding specified foreign financial assets with an aggregate value exceeding $50,000 must report information about those assets on new Form 8938. Unlike the FBAR, which is filed with the Treasury separate from any other tax filings by a June 30 deadline, Form 8938 must be attached to the individual taxpayer’s annual income tax return. Higher asset thresholds apply to U.S. taxpayers who file a joint tax return or who reside abroad (see below). Form 8938 reporting applies for specified foreign financial assets in which the taxpayer has an interest in taxable years starting after March 18, 2010. For most individual taxpayers, this means they should have started filing Form 8938 with their 2011 income tax return. Individual taxpayers that hold interests in foreign financial accounts may thus need to report such accounts on at least three separate forms: their individual U.S. tax return, the FBAR and Form 8938. Individual taxpayers are encouraged to consult with their tax advisers to determine which of these or other forms may be required. The penalty for failure to file the FBAR, if non-willful, is up to $10,000. Willful failures to comply with the filing requirement incur penalties of up to $100,000 or 50% of the foreign financial account balances; criminal penalties may also apply. The IRS says willfulness can be a conscious effort to avoid learning about FBAR reporting. In its internal audit guidance, the IRS says that with hardly any diligence, a taxpayer could have learned of the FBAR filing requirements quite easily. Thus taxpayers with foreign accounts are advised to read the information the government specifies in its tax forms and instructions. A failure to follow-up on this knowledge may provide evidence of “willful blindness.” The penalty for failure to file Form 8938 is up to $10,000 for a failure to disclose the foreign financial assets and an additional $10,000 for each 30-days of non-filing after the IRS issues a notice of failure to disclose, for a maximum potential penalty of $60,000; criminal penalties may also apply. I suggest that when dealing with these very important issues, it is important to utilize a competent CPA with many years of experience in dealing with international tax. In my opinion a long-term former employee of the IRS who was in the international division would be the first step. If that CPA also was an IRS appeals Officer at sometime in his career that would be a plus. The reason for this is we have seen excellent results when a US taxpayer files for amnesty and then opts out. If this tricky procedure is done properly the US taxpayer ends up dealing with the appeals division of the IRS. When you deal with the Appeals Division of the IRS you almost always get a better deal and pay less taxes that could result in a savings of thousands of dollars. I have received a very large number of phone calls form US taxpayers who are trying to deal with some or all of these issues. Almost all of the advise they have received from CPA’s or attorney’s has been in my opinion been flawed. By filing for amnesty and then properly opting out most taxpayers will save thousands. Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning. He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for more than 50 publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and others. Lance has written numerous books including “Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams,” published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s “CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation,” as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including “Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots.” He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxadvisorexpert.com. The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

FBAR International Tax OVDI

Lance Wallach

FBAR and international tax are hot issues that are costing people a lot of money. If you don’t do it right you will have IRS problems. Be careful who helps you. It may cost you a lot of money, or in the extreme time in Jail.
U.S. citizens with financial interest or signature authority over any foreign financial account (including bank, brokerage, securities, or other types of financial accounts) located outside of the United States, are required to report that information each year. Since most, if not all, U.S. citizens residing in a foreign country have a foreign bank account for their ordinary banking activities, they are subject to this same reporting requirement. If a person is required to file FBARs retroactively, they only have to file them for the last six years. The statute of limitations for assessing FBAR penalties is six years from the due date of the FBAR.

A failure to file the FBAR may subject the taxpayer to a willful or a non-willful civil penalty, in absence of reasonable cause. The civil penalty for willfully failing to file an FBAR can be up to $100,000 or 50% of the total account balance at the time of the violation. Non-willful violations are subject to a penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. However, if the failure to file was due to reasonable cause, as determined by the IRS, then there is no penalty. Please be very careful how you do this.

The IRS will consider factors such as taxpayer's reliance on a professional tax advisor, no indication of intent to conceal income or assets and other additional facts that weigh in favor of a determination that the violation was due to reasonable cause. The IRS will consider the facts and circumstances of the taxpayer's situation before imposing a penalty and may instead issue a warning letter. I have received hundreds of phone calls from people with big IRS problems. Many were caused by them getting bad advise.

The IRS reopened the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (2012 OVDP) with News Release IR-2012-5 on January 9, 2012. The 2012 OVDP will remain open for an indefinite period of time, with no set deadline for taxpayers to apply. The overall penalty structure for the 2012 OVDP requires individuals to pay a penalty of 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in foreign accounts/entities or value of foreign assets during the eight tax years prior to disclosure. Some participants, in limited circumstances, will be eligible for a lower penalty of 12.5% or 5%.

Taxpayers must consider their specific situation before making a decision about how best to become compliant with the U.S tax laws. With the announcement of the 2012 OVDP, they and their advisors need to determine whether they should follow the guidance provided in IRS Fact Sheet FS-2011-13, file returns for the past six years and hopefully be granted reasonable cause relief or, alternatively, participate in the 2012 OVDP, file and pay taxes for the past eight years to obtain amnesty from criminal prosecution. They should also consider filing and then opting out. If done correctly this may be the best solution. Consider using an ex ITS agent who was with the international division of the IRS. If he is a CPA that is even better. I have found you get want you pay for. Do not try to do this on your own. Do not use a CPA unless he has years of experience on these issues. You do not want him to learn on the job.

Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the American Institute of CPAs faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters.  He speaks at more than ten conventions annually and writes for over fifty publications. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Mr. Wallach may be reached at 516/938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com, or at www.taxaudit419.com or www.lancewallach.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.

FBAR & IRS: Painful lessons from the 4th Circuit’s US v Williams reversal

July 26, 2012 | FBAR Penalties, International Taxation, Miscellaneous, News, OVDI Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, Voluntary Disclosure

The 4th Circuit takes a hard line on FBAR penalties

Nearly two years ago, I commentated on the lone FBAR court decision, US v. Williams (4th Cir. Jul 20 2012). In this case, the IRS lost. But because the facts were so unique, so limited, it really wasn’t much of a loss for the IRS. After all:
“…Williams’ tax professionals did not advise him to the requirement to file an FBAR. He said he didn’t know he had to and no one made it clear to him that he needed to. Unlike a strict liability offense where state of mind in irrelevant, in order to be liable for willful failure to file penalties, ones must possess a willful state of mind. Ignorance is at best, negligent.
Second, and here’s what I think it most important — is that for tax year 2000, the due date to report the TDF 90-22.1 form was on June 30, 2001. But the thing is that the IRS already knew about the account — since November 2000 when the account was originally frozen!
So when Williams was required to disclose the accounts existence to the IRS on June 30, 2001, Williams already knew the IRS knew about the Credit Agricole. There is no possible way Williams failure to file the FBAR could have possibly helped him and he must have known that. The court reasoned that the failure to check the box and failure to file a TDF 90-22.1 form by the June 30th deadline could have only been an innocent mistake. There actually was no strategic reason for Williams to file an FBAR — thus, the court inferred that the failure to file was not willful.”
So after the district court ruled against the IRS in 2010, I figured the Williams matter to be pretty much over. The case wasn’t all that strong for the government, and the taxpayer had absolutely nothing to gain by not filing the FBAR. After all, he already plead guilty to tax evasion on income earned from the very bank accounts that the IRS assessed the FBAR penalties. I figured the IRS would move on to more fertile ground, and not appeal. I was wrong. The IRS appealed. And more surprising, this time, they won.
And these are the lessons…
1. The IRS is insanely aggressive in assessing FBAR penalties. The IRS threw everything that had at this case and there was no mercy even though prudence would probably have called for it. So people thinking about a so-called ‘quiet’ or ‘soft’ disclosure think twice. And any tax professional advising a course of action — understand the IRS will probably come after you if they catch wind that you profited from advising something other than compliance.
2. Reliance on tax professional is no defense to FBAR penalties. Williams hired counsel during this time to assist him in coming clean. Clearly they missed having him file an FBAR. And if I were in their shoes, I would probably do no different. I am not criticizing his counsel. Of course, in retrospect, they should have. But how were they to know? They attempted a voluntary disclosure. Shouldn’t the IRS have said ‘jeez, we want to process this voluntary disclosure, but it seems we are missing some FBARs.”
So if you are outside the OVDI program, and get assessed FBAR penalties, do not expect the leniency available if you get into the OVDI program. They will push this all the way (However, If you are in the OVDI program reliance on a tax professional is a legitimate reason). Think about it: If the IRS can and will assess FBAR penalties in this case, what case will they not?
3. Willful is a low, low threshold. The 4th circuit has now ruled that “willful” is tantamount to “I could not possibly benefit from non-compliance, I relied on professional advice, and honestly my failure is what 80% of taxpayers so similarly situated did.”
This is a pertinent fact missing form the decision: According to the IRS records, in 2002, no more than 20% of taxpayer who were required to file FBARs actually filed FBARs. The FBAR filing requirement has been in place since 1970, but because of massive confusion and the Treasury even admitting that it it not have the resource to process them. It was a requirement that was routinely ignored…by everyone.
4. Do not expect justice/commonsense/fairness if you do not make an OVDI disclosure. It will not happen. If you do not like the IRS, you must get political. (or wait until a member of congress get caught in an FBAR scandal. Then maybe we can expect some reasonableness to trickle down). If you want to be treated somewhat fairly, you must disclose) by filing an OVDI an aggressively seek a lower penalty amount.
Here’s the thing. Not everyone who failed to file and FBAR or did not report income earned overseas should be treated like a criminal. And in fact, the opposite the vast majority of noncompliance is from either ex-pats, dual citizens or VISA holders who were under the mistaken assumption that because they paid taxes on income earned in their home/host country, the did not need additionally be taxes by the IRS. As this is totally a reasonable position. Look at the 16th Amendment. Where does it say worldwide income? It doesn’t. It actually took a US Supreme Court case, US v Tait, to rule that yes, the IRS could tax you globally.

IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Program Updates

     By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC Abusive Tax Shelter, Listed Transaction, Reportable Transaction    Expert Witness

Call Lance Wallach at (516) 938-5007

---

For years the IRS has been pursuing – the disclosure of information regarding undeclared interests of U.S. taxpayers (or those who ought to be U.S. taxpayers) in foreign financial accounts.

Lance Wallach

On June 26, 2012 the IRS released IR-2012-64/65 and updated Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) providing updated guidance regarding the currently pending offshore voluntary disclosure program (the initial terms of the 2012 OVDP were set forth in IR-2012-5 released on January 9, 2012). The OVDP follows on the success of the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (the 2009 OVDP) and the 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (the 2011 OVDI), which were announced many years after the 2003 Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative (OVCI) and the 2003 Offshore Credit Card Program (OCCP). Such initiatives typically offer reduced penalties in exchange for taxpayers voluntarily coming into compliance before the IRS is aware of their prior tax indiscretions. In part, the success of such initiatives often depends on the perception that they will be followed by strong government tax enforcement efforts.
Under the Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. residents or a person in and doing business in the United States must file a report with the government if they have a financial account in a foreign country with a value exceeding $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Taxpayers comply with this law by noting the account on their income tax return and by filing Form 90-22.1, the FBAR. Willfully failing to file an FBAR can be subject to both criminal sanctions (i.e., imprisonment) and civil penalties equivalent to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the balance in an unreported foreign account— for each year since 2004 for which an FBAR wasn’t filed.
Generally, taxpayers who have undisclosed offshore accounts or assets and meet the requirements of IRM 9.5.11.9 are eligible to apply for IRS Criminal Investigation’s Voluntary Disclosure Practice and the 2012 OVDP penalty regime. The OVDP is available to taxpayers who have both offshore and domestic issues to disclose. The Voluntary Disclosure Practice requires an accurate, and complete voluntary disclosure. Consequently, if there are undisclosed income tax liabilities from domestic sources in addition to those related to offshore accounts and assets, they must also be disclosed in the OVDP. The 2012 OVDP is patterned after the 2011 OVDI but increases the maximum “FBAR-related” penalty from 25% to 27.5% of the highest account value at any time during the most recent eight tax years. The terms of the OVDP, are subject to change at any time.
For calendar year taxpayers the voluntary disclosure period is the most recent eight tax years for which the due date has already passed. The eight-year period does not include current years for which there has not yet been non-compliance. Thus, for taxpayers who submit a voluntary disclosure prior to April 15, 2012 (or other 2011 due date under extension), the disclosure must include each of the years 2003 through 2010 in which they have undisclosed foreign accounts and/or undisclosed foreign entities. Fiscal year taxpayers must include fiscal years ending in calendar years 2003 through 2010. For taxpayers who disclose after the due date (or extended due date) for 2011, the disclosure must include 2004 through 2011. For disclosures made in successive years, any additional years for which the due date has passed must be included, but a corresponding number of years at the beginning of the period will be excluded, so that each disclosure includes an eight-year period.
For taxpayers who establish that they began filing timely, original, compliant returns that fully reported previously undisclosed offshore accounts or assets before making the voluntary disclosure, the voluntary disclosure period will begin with the eighth year preceding the most recent year for which the return filing due date has not yet passed, but will not include the compliant years.
Taxpayers under IRS criminal investigation are not eligible to participate in the OVDP. Also, if the IRS has initiated a civil examination, regardless of whether it relates to undisclosed foreign accounts or undisclosed foreign entities, the taxpayer will not be eligible to participate in the 2012 OVDP.
In 2003, following significant publicity regarding the use of foreign accounts and credit card arrangements by U.S taxpayers, the IRS offered significant penalty relief for taxpayers participating in the OVCI which coincided with strong tax enforcement efforts under the OCCP. Eligible OVCI taxpayers were required to file amended or delinquent returns for three tax years (1999-2001) but could choose to bring tax years 1996-1998 into the OVCI (and would not be examined for any earlier years). Approximately 1,321 taxpayers from 48 countries participated in the OVCI identifying approximately 400 offshore promoters. The IRS agreed to not assert any 75% civil fraud penalties and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) agreed to not assert any civil penalties for the failure to timely file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).
The 2009 OVDP brought in at least 14,700 U.S. taxpayers (disclosing accounts in more than 60 countries) through the front door of IRS Criminal Investigation and untold thousands through a process of quietly amending returns and filing delinquent FBARs with the government. For eligible taxpayers who ventured through the front door, the OVDP provided the certainty of no criminal prosecution and civil penalty relief – they were required to pay back-taxes from 2003 to 2008, interest and a 20-25% penalty on the delinquent taxes. The IRS also imposed a 20% “FBAR-related” penalty equal to the highest aggregate value of the financial account between 2003 and 2008. In limited situations, the FBAR-related penalty could be reduced to 5% of the account value or $10,000 per tax year.
The 2011 OVDI, brought in an additional 12,000 eligible taxpayers who filed original and amended tax returns and agreed to make payments (or good faith arrangements to pay) for taxes, interest and accuracy-related penalties. The 2011 OVDI FBAR-related penalty framework required a 25% “FBAR-related” penalty equal to the highest value of the financial account between 2003 and 2010. Only one 25 percent offshore penalty is to be applied with respect to voluntary disclosures relating to the same financial account. The penalty may be allocated among the taxpayers with beneficial ownership making the voluntary disclosures in any way they choose. Potentially applicable penalties are identified in a series of Frequently Asked Questions available at irs.gov. Participants in the 2011 OVDI also had to pay back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as paying accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties. Subject to certain limitations, financial transactions occurring before 2003 were generally irrelevant for those participating in the OVDI.
Under the 2012 OVDP, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% FBAR-related penalty (FAQ 52). Others qualified for the 5% penalty if they: (a) did not open or cause the account to be opened (unless the bank required that a new account be opened, rather than allowing a change in ownership of an existing account, upon the death of the owner of the account); (b) have exercised minimal, infrequent contact with the account, for example, to request the account balance, or update account-holder information such as a change in address, contact person, or email address; (c) have, except for a withdrawal closing the account and transferring the funds to an account in the United States not withdrawn more than $1,000 from the account in any year covered by the voluntary disclosure; and (d) can establish that all applicable U.S. taxes have been paid on funds deposited to the account (only account earnings have escaped U.S. taxation). For funds deposited before January 1, 1991, if no information is available to establish whether such funds were appropriately taxed, it is presumed that they were.
Taxpayers whose highest aggregate account balance (including the fair market value of assets in undisclosed offshore entities and the fair market value of any foreign assets that were either acquired with improperly untaxed funds or produced improperly untaxed income) in each of the years covered by the 2012 OVDP is less than $75,000 qualified for a 12.5% FBAR-related penalty (FAQ 53). IRS examiners have no authority to negotiate a different FBAR-related penalty.

We have received hundreds of phone calls about these situations. My suggestion is that the way to obtain the best results would be to use a former IRS international manager. He should also be a CPA. In many circumstances we have significantly reduced the taxes by applying for amnesty and then opting out. If this procedure is followed properly you end up dealing with the appeals division of the IRS. In my experience and I think most other tax experts would agree, you can bargain with the appeals officer and if you know what you are doing you usually can substantially reduce your taxes. The down side to this is most tax practioners have little or no experience with this, and will probably not obtain a good result for their client.
As I suggested using a former IRS International tax manager is usually the best way to deal with this situation. If you want even better results make sure he is also a CPA. The ideal situation would be to user a former IRS tax manager with many years experience working for the IRS.
While he was at the IRS, if he worked in the appeals division that would be a plus he should also be a CPA and understand the ramification of all the FBAR, OVDI, and amnesty problems.
If you are caught in this situation you had better get expert help as quickly as possible. This situation can even result in criminal prosecution. If handled properly the fines and penalties can be tremendously reduced.




ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Lance Wallach
Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, financial and estate planning, and abusive tax shelters. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Pulbic Radio's All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education's CPA's Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit www.taxaudit419.com

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any other type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice. 

Nontrust Forms of Ownership

          Since trusts are not permitted in some countries, it was not possible to create a QDOT in those countries.  TRA ’97 provides the Treasury Department with regulatory authority to treat as trusts legal arrange­ments that have substantially the same effect as a trust.  [IRC §2056A(c)]

.2         Authority to Waive Requirement of U.S. Trustee

          In some countries, trusts cannot have any U.S. trustees.  Conse­quently, trusts established in those countries cannot qualify as a QDOT.  In order to permit the establishment of a QDOT in those situations where a country prohibits a trust from having a U.S. trustee, TRA ’97 provides the Treasury Department with regulatory authority to waive the requirement that a QDOT have a U.S. trustee.  [IRC §2056(a)(1)(A)]

.3         Effective Date

          These provisions apply to the estates of decedents dying after August 5, 1997.

It is expected that the Treasury Regulations will require that sufficient trust assets be subject to U.S. jurisdiction to ensure collection of estate tax with respect to the trust.  For example, the Regulations may require that a portion of trust property be located in the U.S. or that the trustee be an institution with substantial U.S. assets.

5.7.4   Tax Treatment

.1         Imposition of Estate Tax

(A)       Estate tax is imposed on the following:

(1)      The value of corpus distributions from the trust made prior to the date of death of the surviving spouse

(2)      The value of property, which remains in a qualified domestic trust on the date of death of the surviving spouse

(3)      The trust that ceases to meet the requirements listed in 5.7.2

          [IRC §2056A(b)]

(B)       Estate tax does not apply to the following:

(1)       After the surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen if:  (a) the spouse was a U.S. resident at the time of the death of the decedent and at all times thereafter; (b) no tax was imposed on a qualified domestic trust distribution before the spouse became a U.S. citizen; or (c) the spouse elects to treat any distribution upon which tax had been imposed as a taxable gift by the spouse to determine the future estate and gift tax liability of the spouse  [IRC §2056A(b)(12)]

(2)       A distribution of corpus from a qualified domestic trust to a surviving spouse if the distribution is made on account of hardship  [IRC §2056A(b)(3)]

(3)       Any distribution to the surviving spouse to the extent that the distribution is to reimburse the spouse for any income tax on trust income to which the spouse is not entitled under the terms of the trust  [IRC §2056A(b)(15)]

.2         Amount of Estate Tax

(A)     The amount of the estate tax imposed by IRC §2056A is the additional estate tax which would have been imposed under IRC §2001 on the decedent’s estate if the decedent’s taxable estate had been increased by the sum of:

(1)      The amount involved in the taxable event; plus

(2)      The aggregate amount involved in previous taxable events with respect to qualified domestic trusts of the decedent; reduced by

(3)      The tax that would have been imposed on the estate of the decedent if the taxable estate of the decedent had been increased by the aggregate amount involved in previous taxable events with respect to qualified domestic trusts of the decedent.  [IRC §2056A(b)(2)]

(B)     If the estate tax for the estate of the decedent spouse has not been finally determined, a tentative tax is imposed by use of the highest estate tax rate in effect as of the date of the death of the decedent.  When the estate tax liability of the decedent spouse is finally determined, the excess tentative tax over the additional estate tax which would have been imposed had the property been included in the estate tax of the decedent is refundable.  [IRC §2056A(b)(2)(B)]

(C)       Multiple Qualified Domestic Trusts

          For more than one qualified domestic trust with respect to a decedent, the amount of estate tax imposed is calculated by use of the highest tax rate in effect at the date of the death of the decedent, unless the executor selects an individual U.S. citizen or domestic corporation to be responsible to file all returns and pay all tax for all trusts and meet the other requirements of the Regulations.  [IRC §2056A(b)(2)(C)]

5.7.5   Compliance

.1       The estate tax imposed due to a distribution is due on the 15th day of the fourth month which follows the calendar year in which the distribution occurs.  The estate tax imposed on a distribution during the year in which the surviving spouse dies and the tax imposed on the death of the spouse is due and payable nine months after the date of the death of the spouse.  [IRC §2056A(b)(5)]

.2       Form 706-QDT was issued in 1991 to report the estate tax required by IRC §2056A and the hardship distributions to the spouse.  The reporting date was September 16, 1991, for taxable events and hardship distributions that took place between November 10, 1988, and January 1, 1991.  After December 31, 1990, the due date is April 15th of the year following the year of the taxable event or hardship distribution.  [Ann. 91-58, 1991-15 IRB 39]

.3       The trustee is personally liable for the estate tax.  Payment from the trust in satisfaction of tax liability is treated as an additional distribu­tion which is subject to tax.  [IRC §§2056A(b)(6) and (11)]

____________________[j1]